A. America is a country built on the value of freedom of religious expression. Telling a particular group they should just move out of the way for a past incident that isn't necessarily indicative of their followers is bigoted, and narrow-minded.
B. Freedom of religion is one thing, but Muslims should have considered what effect such a building would have on residents of New York. It's a question of sensitivity.
And, naturally, people are getting fired up on both sides, seeing things in black and white... but many are informed and just have an opinion on the subject. After all, these are people who were around the city during 9/11; they have a right to just feel a certain way, without even considering the Constitution.
As for myself, I don't have a problem with this community center going up. Why?
1. It's NOT a mosque. And even if it were, I wouldn't have a problem with it.
2. I hate how some are assuming this center is going to a "staging point" for terrorist attacks in the US. That's... well... stupid. I mean, really, really, really stupid. Mayor Michael Bloomberg said it best:
Whether you like a mosque or don't like a mosque, you don't have to go! There's already another mosque down there within four blocks of the World Trade Center. There's porno places... there's fast food places... I mean it's a vibrant community! It's New York!
If you stand beside the former, you might as well assume a citizen of any nation residing in NYC in which Islam is practiced is plotting something. By the same token, you could make an argument for Jewish people in Williamsburg... black people in Harlem... I mean, is the mere presence of another culture (my apologies to implying that those in Williamsburg and Harlem are not part of American culture... just showing the hodgepodge that is New York) threatening to you? Why? Muslims have been and most likely will always be in New York City. I, for one, would choose to believe in the best in people, even if that belief isn't warranted.
Sometimes, things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most — that people are basically good... Doesn't matter if they're true or not. You see, a man should believe in those things, because those are the things worth believing in.
As with any divisive issue, the idiots are out in force (thanks to JP). With the controversy of a group supposedly responsible for a disaster being allowed to "build a monument to its success", an analogy was made, that of building a Shinto Shrine at Pearl Harbor. A testament to the Japanese "victory"; they may not have won the war, but if they can have a religious shrine at the location where they dealt a striking blow to US forces... well... I'm not sure what the result will be.
Two things here.
Anyone who has spent any time in Japan can tell you they've probably never seen a nation more resolved to disassociate itself from its wartime actions (I also don't think they're teaching this too well to schoolchildren). Japan as a nationalistic society was probably never more gung ho than in the months leading up to August 6th, 1945. I believe they would have followed the Emperor's orders without question, gladly fighting to the very last man. Regardless of how you feel the US handled August 6th and 9th, it's more amazing just how the country was able to turn around following the Emperor's radio announcement to surrender. All of a sudden, that wartime ambition vanished. Japan was no longer the center of the universe. The flag and writing were changed. US troops occupied the country for years. My point is, the Japanese weren't seeking retribution or trying to create a stigma building a Shinto Shrine near Pearl Harbor; they had spent years humbled by the events of August 6th and 9th, and they definitely aren't using it to stage an attack.
Second, some who use this analogy on the building of the Islamic community center don't know what they're talking about:
Yes, the Japanese are Buddhist. And Shinto. But a Shinto Shrine is not a Buddhist temple. If you're going to use a flawed analogy, at least use it somewhat correctly, so it can be disproven on its lack of foundation alone... I think that makes sense. Well, at least do some fact checking.